At 01:22 PM 18/07/2000 -0700, Jon Callas <jon(_at_)callas(_dot_)org> wrote:
At 1:40 PM +0800 7/18/00, Erron Criddle wrote:
>FROM:
>
>10) FR is loaded with C11 to C18
>
>TO:
>
>10) FR is loaded with C[BS+3] to C[BS + (BS+2)]
>
I changed it to:
FR is loaded with C[BS+3] to C[BS + (BS+2)] (which is C11-C18 for an
8-octet block).
I think this addresses all the concerns?
Yes - the more well defined the RFC is, the easier it will be for others to
understand in the future.
Regards
Erron Criddle
Comasp Ltd.
Level 2, 45 Stirling Hwy
NEDLANDS WA 6009
Fax: 08 9386 9473
Tel: 08 9386 9534
http://www.comasp.com
ejc(_at_)comasp(_dot_)com