Re: Signature Subpacket format questions

At 4:28 PM +0900 7/19/00, sen_ml(_at_)eccosys(_dot_)com wrote:

> since there does not appear to be any mention of null-termination in
> the section on text (3.4), i interpreted "String" to mean that there
> is no null-termination.  [ also because many of the field boundaries
> can be determined by various lengths that are explicitly spelled out
> as well as length definitions. ]
You're correct -- there's no null termination on any of the strings.

                Jon