Re: SHA256 ?

At 3:49 PM +0200 4/11/01, disastry(_at_)saiknes(_dot_)lv wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> isn't it time to define new algorithm numbers for SHA2 ?
> 8 for SHA256 (and maybe 9,10 for SHA384,512?)
>
> the bigger problem however is with OIDs...
> none of SHA2 have OIDs defined, just like HAVAL and TIGER :(
That is, in fact, the bigger problem. We can either finesse it -- we agree
on an OID to use for them -- or we wait for some other OID space to assign
them.

        Jon
--