On 9/17/02 8:20 AM, "Michael Young" <mwy-opgp97(_at_)the-youngs(_dot_)org>
wrote:
The MDC in OpenPGP is really no more than a checksum, intended to
detect accidental damage. (In fact, during the discussion, I believe
that some folks suggested that it be just a checksum.) Before the
MDC, there was little ability to detect *any* sort of accident -- not
just truncation, but fairly arbitrary internal damage as well. (When
the payload is a compressed packet, the decompression might discover
damage, but then again, it might not.) There was discussion of a
stronger MAC, but I think this was dropped given that OpenPGP has a
strong signature mechanism.
Yes, and no. The MDC is supposed to detect intentional damage as well as
accidental damage. While a checksum was suggested, it was rejected because
it's pretty obvious that would not have the desired characteristics.
It *is* true that the MDC is not and was never intended to be a MAC. The
goal of the MDC is to reliably detect modification of the data in the
envelope, whether by insertion, deletion, or changing it. If an attacker can
do that, then then MDC has failed and we need a new mechanism.
Also note that the MDC's hash is weakly keyed, as there is an "IV" for it
inside the envelope.
If we need to, there are ways we could turn this into a MAC, including a
function over the key, or key+hashkey, or even including an extra MAC key
inside the ESK.
I think there are a number of separate questions around this that include:
(1) Is there a security problem in the MDC as in bis-06?
(2) Should we change it regardless?
Each of those is important. If the answer to (1) is yes, then we need
something. (2) needs to balance existing deployment and so on.
Jon