Re: Subpacket clarification

On 3/14/03 5:39 PM, "David Shaw" <dshaw(_at_)jabberwocky(_dot_)com> wrote:

> > The subpacket areas are intended to be unordered. I think specifying
> > ordering is a bad idea, as you have to solve the general case, anyway.
> > OpenPGP needs simplification, not more arcane rules.
> I'd be quite content to see that sentence go away altogether.
It's gone.

    Jon