-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:47:55PM -0500, Michael Young wrote:
>>I'd like to see
>>recommendations for each flavor of signature that reflect
>>real needs.
>
> I think that is straying into overkill. If there is no security or
> protocol correctness issue at hand, just say nothing.
>
> Let's credit implementors with some ability to know which
> subpackets
I apologize. Earlier drafts specified that creation time and
issuer were mandatory subpackets. The current draft no longer
carries that language (and is better for it).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBP6Auouc3iHYL8FknEQIKOwCgsYaSOfZtBUwUReM9XzjsGcg6c9gAnjFx
MnuUjqxMPhthubAxBX04miFS
=0wF+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----