Re: [ISSUE] User attribute language problem2004-03-22 09:43:44On 19 Mar, 2004, at 5:58 PM, David Shaw wrote: Very minor problem here in section 5.12 (the User Attribute Packet). The first sentence in that section is: The User Attribute packet is a variation of the User ID packet. It is capable of storing more types of data than the User ID packet which is (by convention) limited to text. The parenthetical "(by convention)" should be removed as it is no longer true. User IDs are required to be text. David Fixed in -11. Jon
|
|