Re: Forward Secrecy

Jon Callas wrote:

> I think this is a great idea and ought to be part of the WG's scope. 
> I'd even like to see some of the OTR work brought in here.
> I don't see why this shouldn't just get a good buffing and go.

As long as it doesn't hold up the draft, that
would be fine!  How about we set a deadline
on the draft, and go to the next step on it?

iang

--
News and views on what matters in finance+crypto:
       http://financialcryptography.com/