Re: Critical bits and notations

ietf-openpgp

Re: Critical bits and notations

2005-05-11 03:30:20


On Tue, 10 May 2005 21:28:36 -0700 (PDT), "Hal Finney" said:

In my opinion, the critical bit on a notation packet should mean
that the implementation needs to recognize that particular notation,
not just notation packets in general.  Otherwise we would have no way


I agree.  This matches the way the critical flag of CMS' extended
attributes is used.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Critical bits and notations, David Shaw Re: Critical bits and notations, "Hal Finney" Re: Critical bits and notations, Werner Koch <= Re: Critical bits and notations, David Shaw Re: Critical bits and notations, Jon Callas Re: Critical bits and notations, Ben Laurie Re: Critical bits and notations, Werner Koch Re: Critical bits and notations, Ben Laurie Re: Critical bits and notations, David Shaw

Previous by Date:	Re: Critical bits and notations, "Hal Finney"
Next by Date:	minor comments on draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-12.txt, Rachel Willmer
Previous by Thread:	Re: Critical bits and notations, "Hal Finney"
Next by Thread:	Re: Critical bits and notations, David Shaw
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]