Re: Secret key signature packet2005-08-23 11:37:58On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:51:49PM -0400, Adam Back wrote: I might be misunderstanding but I read the original poster to be maybe hinting at modification detection of the private key ring somehow. I am not sure of any attack based on modifying the private key in an undetectable way... that would generally seem to make invalid signatures, and inability to decrypt. Could the original poster be thinking of the Klima-Rosa attack and the secret key "s2k 254" SHA-1 protection? David
|
|