Re: Problems with v4 key packet format

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 05:55:03PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:

> The thing is, I can't really decide if that is a threat or a
> feature...
In such cases isn't the best policy to let the users and/or implementers decide
for themselves? How about having hashed and unhashed subpackets just like in
v4 signatures, where all are subject to signatures but only the hashed ones
are included in the fingerprint?

-- 
Daniel