-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I agree that some level of consensus would be a good thing. I don't
know if there's a current way to formalize this in the IETF. In the
old days they allegedly required "three genetically separate
implementations". I see your idea as being along this line. Some
number of implementations GREATER THAN one.
If the working group thinks it is a good thing, very little is
needed. You need an Internet Draft that says:
You MAY implement Camillia. [ref]
Cipher number is 11.
I picked 11 because it's the next number. And then a lot of
boilerplate, and a little bit of kerfuffle. If the [ref] contains
test vectors etc., then the kerfuffle is kept to a minimum.
To make that draft into a standards-track finished document, you need
something like interop proof.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.1
Charset: US-ASCII
wj8DBQFGLTjvsTedWZOD3gYRAjBVAKDXVjzStdC309fUT9t7OiTRjCU/pgCfZFOi
QSiS4yrIjN27XpMKFrNshts=
=zbqZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----