Simon Josefsson <simon(_at_)josefsson(_dot_)org> writes:
Supporting PKCS#1 v2.0 padding sounds like a separate effort though. Is
anyone interested in that?
I think you need to phrase the question slightly differently:
Supporting a mechanism that's supported by nothing and that breaks
compatibility with all existing implementations, and that has no obvious
advantages over the existing mechanism, sounds like a separate effort
though. Is anyone interested in that?
Then the answer becomes self-evident.
Peter.