-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
i'm pretty sure that's not what he suggested, actually. But clearly it
wasn't successfully communicated to everyone, since we appear to have
different interpretations. Jon, can you clarify what you meant?
I meant nothing more than a one-byte algorithm number (section 9.4) and then
the hash. So for example all the current fingerprints could be recoded with an
0x02 (SHA1) and then the existing fingerprint. If you want to version it, too,
sure, why not. I think it's superfluous, but it wouldn't hurt and what's a byte
among friends?
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.10.0 (Build 554)
Charset: us-ascii
wj8DBQFNOFk8sTedWZOD3gYRAl/kAKCq81J9mFBXQaTSrpgI6K38EHSwjQCgwwqh
ygCLYLfs+YV1pxn++5SvAcM=
=fPxq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----