On 07/27/2012 08:53 AM, David Shaw wrote:
it seems that this was noticed by Marc Horowitz in 2000 (see
http://www.mhonarc.org/archive/html/ietf-openpgp/2000-12/msg00001.html ), but
for one reason or another it wasn't resolved before publication.
thanks for digging that up.
Nice catch! I think this would be a good errata item for the RFC.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html
I've now reported it:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4880&eid=3298
Has anyone else tried to implement this corner of the spec? If so, how
did you handle subkey revocation signatures? I'd like to be more
confident that we aren't breaking interoperability with anyone by making
this clarification (though arguably the interoperability is probably
already broken if anyone was writing to spec).
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp