Re: [openpgp] OpenPGP private certification

On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 09:05 -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: 
> If I could remember my passphrase then I would not need to revoke.
Which is why people are ever since suggested to create their revocation
when the create their key.


> My point here is that if we want to get a billion people using
> encrypted mail then it has to offer iPhone class usability, not OK for
> 1990s usability.
Crypto is not an iPhone.
Just accept that you can't make a system securely usable if people
aren't willing to learn how it works and put some effort into it.


> Since key
> server enrollment can be made automatic, it would be pretty easy to
> renew the enrollment once every n months and discard keys that have
> not been renewed for 5 years or for more than a year if there is a
> replacement key.
Removing a key (and its associated information like revocations or other
signatures) from the keyservers is generally a break of security, as it
allows for blocking or similar attacks.
And attacker could make a valid key removed just by blocking keys that
haven't been "renewed".

Chris.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp