Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints

ietf-openpgp

Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints

2015-07-30 11:45:46


On 30 Jul 2015, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

OK, 'at least the 512 bit fingerprint'...


How are we even back to talking about 512 bit fingerprints?  I'm getting
a feeling we are starting to repeat everything that was discussed in the
original "fingerprints" thread here.


 - V

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, (continued) Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Vincent Breitmoser Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Daniel Kahn Gillmor Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Wyllys Ingersoll Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Daniel Kahn Gillmor Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Derek Atkins Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Vincent Breitmoser Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Vincent Breitmoser <= Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Gregory Maxwell

Previous by Date:	Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Next by Date:	Re: [openpgp] The DANE draft, Simon Josefsson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Vincent Breitmoser
Next by Thread:	Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints, Gregory Maxwell
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]