Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill(_at_)hallambaker(_dot_)com> writes:
There is a very clear need for 512 bits and there is a case for 256 bits.
What's the clear need for -512? By which I mean a demonstrated practical need
for a hash size of 64 bytes, not a hypothesised need given an imaginary
attack. I can see a need for SHA-256 (to replace SHA-1), but for something
like SHA3-512 all I can see are downsides (compared to SHA2-256).
Peter.
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp