On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:25:42PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:17, wk(_at_)gnupg(_dot_)org said:
What do others think:
- Use SHA-256 and truncated to 200 bits
- Use SHA-512 and truncated to 200 bits
- Anything else
No opinions?
Have you considered making fingerprints a non-hexidecimal encoding, such as
base32? They could be the same size, but with more bits.
Bitcoin Core has done a lot of research lately in creating a good base32
encoding with UI features like single-digit error detection and correction.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp