On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 02:17, sandals(_at_)crustytoothpaste(_dot_)net said:
If you want a truncated format you can extend later, why not use
SHAKE128 or SHAKE256? Then you don't have to implement a non-standard
SHAKE is not part of OpenPGP yet and I doubt that this will be a
mandatory algorithm in 4880bis. SHA-256 is de-facto a mandatory
algorithm right now and available in all OpenPGP implementations.
We need to provide a smooth upgrade path for implementations and not
require them to throw new algorithms in.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
pgpSYgtrA2vx4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp