ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [openpgp] New S2K specifiers?

2019-03-31 23:03:29
On Sun 2019-03-31 13:10:24 +0100, Damien Goutte-Gattat wrote:
* Is there any interest for a “more modern” S2K, or is the
  Iterated+Salted S2K still considered fine enough for RFC4880bis?

I think having argon2i included in rfc4880bis would be concretely
useful; iterated+salted hasn't been the best practice for S2K for well
over a decade.

The main argument i can imagine against it is if no OpenPGP
implementation has any plans or desire to implement it, or if there are
specific objections related to IPR.

I would like to hear from people who think rfc4880bis should not include
a winner of the PHC, if the goal is a cryptographic refresh.

      --dkg

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>