On 07 June 2019 18:59, Daniel Huigens wrote:
It seems this signature didn't hash the 6 zero bytes from the new fields
described at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-07#page-44, right?
Yes. It was generated before I recognized this obscurity of v5 signatures.
I have attached a corrected v5 signature on the same file.
Good luck.
--
Heiko
dkgpg-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp