On Sat 2020-10-03 20:20:53 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:37, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz said:
A piece is an atom possibly followed by '*', '+', or '?'.
bis:
A piece is an atom possibly followed by '_', '+', or '?'.
Good catch. That seems to be a bug introduced with the change to the
new Ruby tool. In the soruce it is correct:
A piece is an atom possibly followed by '*', '+', or '?'. An atom
followed by '*' matches a sequence of 0 or more matches of the
Has anyone more experience with that new tool?
I've posted several minor cleanup edits here:
https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/29
I think that commit 756d8b6a9ba6f3f1e20637a2b628b6984697f022 addresses
the concern discussed above, but the whole series is probably worth applying.
Regards,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp