Stephen Farrell <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:
> - given that timeline is not long (compared to the age
> of 4880 say:-), I'd encourage people to hold fire 'till
> that's done and we should be able to get going as an
> "official" WG in the not-too-distant (starting in on
> it all in detail now risks having to re-do stuff in
> a month or so, so probably isn't worthwhile I'd say)
In the meantime, if we plan on having virtual interims (I hope so) to time
box ML discussion, then I suggest that we might want to doodle-poll,
(or that other tool you prefer) for a consistent time-of-the-week in which to
do the virtual interims.
If we are going monthly, which week.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT
consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp