Hi,
Understood, maybe there are some other word that could be used that better
express this aspect. Something for people to consider.
Cheers
Magnus
On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 13:02 +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 17/12/2020 12:47, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker wrote:
What is the definition of un-interested party? By reviewing are they
not sufficiently interested to be an "interested party"?
There are various groups of people that are more or less
loosely or tightly associated with specific implementations
so we wanted to make it clear that such a group piling on
for a thing they really like (perhaps for good reason) isn't
sufficient for adoption. I don't think it'd be useful to try
define that more precisely as we'd get it wrong and maybe
just irritate people, so best I can see it'll have to depend
on WG chair judgement as to which reviews count that way or
not.
Cheers,
S.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp