Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg(_at_)fifthhorseman(_dot_)net> wrote:
> - To signal that we're in a "reset", we'll make a new draft,
> draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh, with Paul and Werner as editors.
> This new draft will be marked as a replacement for
> draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-10.
> - crypto-refresh-00 (that is, the first revision of the new draft)
> will incorporate just the text of 4880 {PERIOD}, inconsequential editorial
> updates, the verified errata of 4880, and incorporation of the relevant
> text from RFCs 5581 (Camellia) and 6637 (ECC), so all substantive
> changes from 4880 are things that have already been through the IETF
> document publication process already.
I suggest that -00 be just rfc4880 be just redo in modern XML.
We did that for RFC8514 (DHCPv6bis).
So, where I marked {PERIOD} above. Then let -01 be all the rest.
If you are using markdown, I also suggest that you start every new sentence
on a newline, as that makes the git diff process much easier.
> - If we can accept that crypto-refresh document as a starting point,
> we'll have a series of diffs proposed (every week or two) to the WG.
Perfect.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT
consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp