On Tue 2021-03-02 08:21:18 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
I would also suggest to remove any mention of the Suite B profile.
If we mention a specific local standard others countries may also want
to have their profiles mentioned (e.g. Brainpool in Europe).
With no hats on, just speaking as a user and an implementer: I'd also be
fine with removing all mention of "compatibility profiles" (including
Suite B) from the crypto-refresh draft. We're going to have enough work
to do to settle on changes to Mandatory-to-Implement and other
implementation guidance, and i think these profiles are confusing and
unclear.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp