Re: [openpgp] Implementers: does your OpenPGP tool gracefully discard si

Oops, sorry, mischecked dates.

These fixes landed master some time ago, but not available in v0.16.0 
(targeted for the v0.17.0).
On 29.04.2022 15:58, Nickolay Olshevsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It depends on what is called 'chokes' and which behaviour is expected.
>
> RNP since v0.16.0 handles such cases in the following way: API returns 
> information about the valid/invalid/unknown signatures and CLI 
> interprets that, displaying information to the user. However, CLI 
> still returns error code if at least one signature is invalid or 
> unknown. Probably that's why it is marked in red in the 
> interoperability test suite.
>
> On 29.04.2022 03:28, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > The Ask
> > =======
> >
> > Could every implementer please take a look at the sample messages
> > offered in the interop test suite, run them against their tooling, and
> > propose and identify a patch if the current tooling chokes?  If you
> > think the test suite is wrong, and your client handles the situation
> > fine despite looking problematic in the test suite, that would also be
> > good news.  Please report!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >          --dkg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openpgp mailing list
> > openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp
--
  Best regards,
  Nickolay Olshevsky
  o(_dot_)nickolay(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com

OpenPGP_0xB82E690843E5C423.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp