Have you seen the I-D by Beck and Hofmann?
At 07:37 AM 11/27/00 +0000, Shuvendu Dang wrote:
Hi,
Can we have a "Pre-Requisite" element also. This
element is basically for matching rules only if a
previous rule has(has not) been matched for that
particular message transaction (consisting of a
request and response message).
Means for a rule to be triggered say at the Proxy
Response point, a previous rule must have been(or must
have not been) triggered at say the Client Request
point.
This will make way for rules getting triggered on
whether a previous rule has been triggered or not at
any "processing-point"(or "filter-point"), and not
just on nested "property" elements at that
"processing-point"(only for one message transaction
and the pre-reqisites are only valid for rules within
one rule module).
(Does this make sense???). Comments awaited.
=====
SHUVENDU DANG
Student Intern
Sun Microsystems India Pvt. Ltd.
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.in address at http://mail.yahoo.co.in
Michael W. Condry
Director, Internet Strategy
Intel Corporation
2111 NE 25th Avenue
M/S JF3-206
Hillsboro, OR 97124
503-264-9019
condry(_at_)intel(_dot_)com