To: Michael Condry <condry(_at_)intel(_dot_)com>, Markus Hofmann
<hofmann(_at_)bell-labs(_dot_)com>
cc: J(_dot_)Crowcroft(_at_)cs(_dot_)ucl(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
Subject: OPES - routing to proxylets
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 10:17:08 +0100
From: Jon Crowcroft <J(_dot_)Crowcroft(_at_)cs(_dot_)ucl(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>
as per my comments in OPES just now on routing:
(can you fwd to the list - its addr isnt on the agenda!)
Application level routing
for existing work in IETF see
CDI working group & Beep working group (actually APEX) which are
working on app level routing for content distribution in two different
ways (see agenda for this week for links to their drafts
for academic stuff (incliuding original use of word proxylet:-)
see
An Architecture for Application Layer Routing, Ghosh, Fry & Crowcroft,
'An Architecture for Application Layer
Routing', Yasuda, H. (Ed), Active Networks, LNCS 1942, Springer, pp
71-86. ISBN 3-540-41179-8 Springer-Verlag
ftp://cs.ucl.ac.uk/darpa/iwan.ps.gz
for cool content addressable net paper, see ACM SIGCOMM 2001 paper
A Scalable Content-Addressable Network
by Sylvia Ratnasamy (University of
California at Berkeley and ACIRI), Paul Francis (Tahoe Networks), Mark
Handley (ACIRI), Richard Karp (U.C. Berkeley and ACIRI), Scott
Shenker (ACIRI)
at
http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm2001/p13.html
Michael W. Condry
Director, Network Edge Technology