Martin Stecher wrote:
>A compagnon document summarizing the common usage of such headers
>would be very helpful and, IMHO, important.
I fully agree. Anybody who likes to help to create that document?
That shouldn't be a big effort. If we use the expired draft on
"Transmitting Subscriber Identification in iCAP" as a starting point,
the other few commonly implemented X-headers can easily be added. I'll
get in touch with you to wrap this up and close on it.
Yes, of course; it has been published nearly a year ago.
Why do you use "would"?
Because it is not (yet) an RFC, therefore the subjunctive.
Do you suggest to create a WG version of that draft? Maybe with some
additions that consider points (4) to (10)?
No!!!
-Markus