Re: FW: publish draft: draft-ietf-opes-authorization-01
2003-02-03 08:24:10
Weisong Shi wrote:
I don't think the notion of group and membership is a good idea
here. Sometime, it is incorrect. For example, let assume user Alice
wants service 1 and service 2, and in the order 1,2. user Bob wants
service 2 and service 1 too, but in the order 2,1. In this case,
without calling the service for each request send by either Alice or
Bob, we can not guarantee the correcness of service execution.
In this particular case, you could specify two separate groups - the
first one includes users who 'subscribed' to executing service 1
followed by service 2, and a second group of users who 'subscribed' to
executing the two services in reverse order. The notion of groups is
still beneficial, since there can be multiple users in both groups.
-Markus
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: FW: publish draft: draft-ietf-opes-authorization-01,
Markus Hofmann <=
|
|
|