Folks,
the deadline for our rules language document was October last year.
This deadline has already been extended a few times. So we need to
decide on how to move on with this document.
Based on earlier discussions on the mailing list about status and work
needed, we checked with Ted (our AD) and discussed the following options:
(1) Produce a minimal draft on "P" now, knowing that it will not
be sufficient and be obsolete if the group gets re-chartered
and if it continues to work on "P".
Pros: We would meet the charter item
Cons: Wastes time (assuming "P" will be in possible re-charter)
(2) Extend the current deadline for another 2-4 months.
(3) Remove this specific work item from our current charter and
put it up for consideration in a possible re-charter.
After discussions with Ted, we believe that choice (3) is the most
sensible, as it allows us to actually to do the work we believe needs
doing, and all this in a realistic time frame. We also won't waste any
time completing a document that won't meet our needs.
As such, we'll send a request to our AD and to the secretariat to
remove the OPES rules language from our current charter and include it
in discussions for a re-charter.
Any strong objections?
Thanks,
Markus