Re: Do we know the RFC number for the arch document?

Alex Rousskov wrote:


> > I'd assume you can simply put in a placeholder, which will then be
> > corrected once the RFC number is out.
>
> Shouldn't we continue to use ID names to increase the chances of RFC
> Editor replacing them with _correct_ RFC numbers?
I've seen either way in the past. But as Marshal also recommended to 
stick with the ID, let's do that.
Thanks,
  Markus