Re: Status Update

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> I am not sure what to do at this point: I can post P draft and start  
> working on fixing known issues, with others help. It will take a few  
> iterations before P Core can be submitted to IESG, IMO. Alternatively, 
> we  can re-open the discussion on whether we can extend Sieve enough so 
> that  it accomodates OPES needs for HTTP and SMTP adaptations, at least. 
> I am  happy to work on P, but I need an "official" go-ahead from the WG 
> to avoid  wasting time on a new language the group is not interested in.
> How do we proceed?
Given that several voices suggested that sieve extensions are 
promising and could meet OPES needs, we should consider again whether 
this is the case or not. This will take additional time, but seems 
important.
I suggest that anyone with an opinion on this topic posts to the list 
either (a) an example of what can *not* easily be done with sieve 
extensions, or (b) describes how sieve extensions would be used to 
meet OPES needs.
-Markus