----- Original Message -----
From: tony(_at_)XXXXX(_dot_)com
To: <hsantos(_at_)XXXXXXXXX(_dot_)com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:36 PM
Hector Santos wrote:
The "150-" was required, so test #2 was successful:
C: DATA
S: 354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
S: 150-Please Wait
S: 250 Message accepted for delivery. (bytes: 2573)
C: QUIT
Outlook accepted the "150-" without any error and waited for the 250
response.
A 250- should have worked as well.
That was my first natural thought and trial. Just like in FTP.
The client in this case, didn't like that.
Personally, I think this is better this way because you don't know what the
eventual response code might be.
This is the problem with the FTP continuation codes. If I recall, the
first
continuation code provided must be the same across all remaining responses
and the
final response code. It doesn't have a "150" like concept.
Sincerely,
Hector Santos, CTO
Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
305-431-2846 Cell
305-248-3204 Office