Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security-00

Martin - thanks much for published an updated version.

All - could you please take a look at this updated version. In 
particular, if you had a comment/concern before, can you please let us 
know if it has been addressed. We'd like to move forward with a WGLC if 
there are no more concerns.
Thanks,
  Markus


Stecher,Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I requested to publish the new revision draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security-01
> last Friday.
> It is not yet available on the IETF site but should be soon.
>
> Txt and HTML versions can also be found here:
> http://www.martin-stecher.de/opes/draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security-01.txt
> http://www.martin-stecher.de/opes/draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security-01.html
>
> Many (but not all) comments from the list have been addressed.
> Thanks a lot for your feedback.
>
> The most noticeable change is the new section 5 that summarizes how the IAB
> considerations are addressed one-by-one.
>
> Let me know whether this is now ready for (or closer to) a WGLC.
>
> Best regards
> Martin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ietf-openproxy(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org 
> > [mailto:owner-ietf-openproxy(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Tony Hansen
> > Sent: Montag, 28. August 2006 22:13
> > To: OPES Group
> > Subject: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security-00
> >
> >
> > I've sent a bunch of nits to Martin.
> >
> > After the other comments on the list have been addressed in a 
> > new version, I think this document is ready to be forwarded 
> > to last call.
> >         Tony Hansen
> >         tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
> >
> > Markus Hofmann wrote:
> > > We are starting WG last call on the "Integrity, privacy and 
> > security 
> > > in OPES for SMTP" draft (see draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security-00.txt).