[Top] [All Lists]

RE: micalg semantics and use

1997-07-28 22:57:32

OK, I can't resist the opportunity;  

How about a quick show of hands for "md5" and "sha1" (no dash).  Does
this work with existing implementations ?  Is the micalg value case
sensitive (I think I've asked this question before...) ?

From:  Paul Hoffman / IMC[SMTP:phoffman(_at_)imc(_dot_)org]
Sent:  Monday, July 28, 1997 4:06 PM
To:    ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject:       RE: micalg semantics and use

At 3:20 PM -0700 7/28/97, Blake Ramsdell wrote:
Forget my previous proposal about pkcs7-md5 and pkcs7-sha1 -- use "md5"
and "sha1"!

This sounds good to me.

--Paul E. Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>