ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IETF S/MIME

1997-09-11 12:56:57
From: keithd(_at_)securitydomain(_dot_)com

... there is a bigger issue which is the RSA cryptosystem.



I don't think the RSA algorithm is particularly important for two reasons:

1) as Jeff Schiller pointed out in Memphis, there aren't that many years
left of patent protection on RSA.  Once it expires, no one needs a license
to do their own implementation.  My bet is that the patent will expire
before S/MIME makes it all the way to full IETF Standard :-).  RC2, on the
other hand, was claimed to be a trade secret, and that protection never
expires.

2) The trend in IETF working groups (TLS and PKIX, not to mention that
other email protocol :-) is to make DSA/DH algorithms mandatory, and
RSA optional.  If S/MIME progresses along the standards track, it would
probably do so as well.  Those implementors who wanted to provide
backwards compatibility with S/MIME v2 could buy an RSA license,
but implementors who did DSA/DH only (without licensing RSA) would be
assured of interoperability with all IETF-compliant implementations.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>