All,
I apologize for the inconvenience caused by my company's mail system. Our
system admin staff is working on this problem right now. The ccMail gateway
at our company seems to be repeating the message that I sent.
Sorry,
John Pawling
Return-Path: <BlakeR(_at_)deming(_dot_)com>
X-Server-Uuid: 1a012586-24e9-11d1-adae-00a024bc53c5
From: "Blake Ramsdell" <BlakeR(_at_)deming(_dot_)com>
To: "'jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com'" <jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com>
Subject: FW: CMS-00 ASN.1 Module
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 16:05:40 -0800
Return-Receipt-To: <BlakeR(_at_)deming(_dot_)com>
X-Wss-Id: 187FD65C1338-187FD65C1339-01
You mail server seems to be freaking out a bit -- I have seen several
copies of my message come through, with headers as follows:
Received: from host9.deming.com by cane.deming.com with SMTP (Microsoft
Exchange Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.993.5)
id Z3XTSAFN; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 15:55:30 -0800
Received: from 206.86.127.224 by cane.deming.com with SMTP (WorldSecure
Server SMTP Relay v2.01); Wed, 05 Nov 97 15:55:29 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: 1a012586-24e9-11d1-adae-00a024bc53c5
Received: (from majordomo(_at_)localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) id
PAA09991 for ietf-smime-bks; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 15:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.access.digex.net (mail3.access.digex.net
[205.197.247.4]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id
PAA09987 for <ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 15:41:57
-0800 (PST)
From: <BlakeR(_at_)deming(_dot_)com>
Received: from apollo (apollo.jgvandyke.com [158.189.10.100]) by
mail3.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA05572 for
<ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 18:41:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from vda-gateway.jgvandyke.com by apollo (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id
AA00951; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 18:55:50 -0500
Received: from POP3 Client by vda-gateway.jgvandyke.com (ccMail Link to
SMTP R6.0) id AA878773376; Wed, 05 Nov 97 18:43:03 -0500
Message-ID:
<9711058787(_dot_)AA878773376(_at_)vda-gateway(_dot_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com>
X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 97 12:12:29 -0500
To: <jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com>, <ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Subject: RE: CMS-00 ASN.1 Module
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: <owner-ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Precedence: bulk
X-WSS-ID: 187FD8E41202-187FD8E41203-01
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
This seems to indicate that your ccMail gateway is doing something a
little whacky with the message.
Let me know if you have any insight.
Blake
--
Blake C. Ramsdell
Worldtalk Corporation
For current info, check http://www.deming.com/users/blaker
Voice +1 425 882 8861 x103 Fax +1 425 882 8060
-----Original Message-----
From: Blake Ramsdell
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 1997 9:12 AM
To: jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com; ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: CMS-00 ASN.1 Module
On Wednesday, November 05, 1997 11:59 AM, jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com
[SMTP:jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com] wrote:
An ASN.1 module needs to be added to the "Cryptographic Message Syntax"
spec
that consolidates all of the ASN.1 syntaxes defined throughout the spec.
For example, The OriginatorInfo SEQUENCE includes two tags that are marked
IMPLICIT and a third that is not marked IMPLICIT. I believe that the
intent
is for all tags to be IMPLICIT. This situation is resolved by including
all
syntaxes in an ASN.1 module that begins with "DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS".
That would mandate that all tags in the module are IMPLICIT.
I think we need to do the same thing for ESS, right?
Blake
--
Blake C. Ramsdell
Worldtalk Corporation
For current info, check http://www.deming.com/users/blaker
Voice +1 425 882 8861 x103 Fax +1 425 882 8060