ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Wording for removing PKI

1998-02-09 08:51:59
All,

I agree with all of Paul's recommended changes.  I have one minor comment:

Paul recommended the following text for the S/MIME v3 Msg Spec, sec 3.7:
In 3.7, remove the entire section and its subsections, and replace it with:
    3.7 Registration Requests

    A sending agent that signs messages MUST have a certificate for the
    signature so that a receiving agent can verify the signature. There are
    many ways of getting certificates, such as through an exchange with a
    certificate authority, through a hardware token or diskette, and so on.

    S/MIME v2 [SMIMEV2] specified a method for "registering" public keys
    with certificate authorities using an application/pkcs10 body part. The
    IETF's PKIX Working Group is preparing another method for requesting
    certificates; however, that work was not finished at the time of this
    draft. S/MIME v3 does not specify how to request a certificate, but
    instead mandates that every sending agent already has a certificate.


Recommend that the following sentence should be re-worded: 

Paul's sentence: "The IETF's PKIX Working Group is preparing another method
for requesting certificates; however, that work was not finished at the time
of this draft" 

Proposed text: "The IETF's PKIX Working Group is preparing another method
for the: end-entity to request certificates; CA to respond to the request;
and exchange of other certificate management information.  However, that
work was not finished at the time of this draft."

================================
John Pawling   
jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com                             
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.           
================================


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>