I do not agree. I think we should use the UNIVERSAL tag. This will align
us with the correct implementation of UTF8 in the future, rather than
creating an octet hole to carry a UTF8.
Russ
At 08:32 AM 2/19/98 -0500, John Pawling wrote:
All,
I agree with Bancroft Scott that ESSPrivacyMark should be re-defined as
follows:
ESSPrivacyMark ::= CHOICE {
pString PrintableString (SIZE (1..ub-privacy-mark-length)),
utf8String [0] IMPLICIT UTF8String (SIZE (1..ub-privacy-mark-length))
}
Note Bancroft's point as follows:
Another
benefit is that if someone is using a tool that does not support
UTF8String they can simply change it to "[0] OCTET STRING" and get the
same encoding.
================================
John Pawling
jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.
================================