All,
I would add at the end of John's proposal: "... the MLA MAY inform the
originator of that fact by sending a signed receipt."
I would also add the following:
"It is up to the originator to interpret this receipt as an indication that
no other receipts will be received."
Yves Theriault.
At 11:54 AM 5/6/98 -0400, John Pawling wrote:
All,
I don't object to adding the following text to ESS: "In the event that a
ML's signed receipt policy supersedes the originator's request for signed
receipts such that the originator will not receive any signed receipts, then
the MLA MAY inform the originator of that fact."
I would object to this being a SHOULD or MUST requirement.
- John Pawling
At 09:49 AM 5/6/98 -0400, Capt Y. Theriault wrote:
I do not see why the originator should not be informed of his/her denied
request to receive signed receipts. Assuming that there were good reasons
to deny the user of such an information, there are other occasions where
these reasons would not apply. It would be nice for the originator to be
informed of the denial so that no receipts are expected.
Yves Thériault.
Capt Y. Theriault
National Defence Headquarters
PMO Defence Message Handling System Hardware Engineer
MGen R. Pearkes Building, Ottawa K1A 0K2
office: (613) 995-6476
email: aa862(_at_)issc(_dot_)debbs(_dot_)ndhq(_dot_)dnd(_dot_)ca