EKR <ekr(_at_)rtfm(_dot_)com> writes:
I don't agree with your characterization that a DH static key is
'insecure due to reuse'. While it's true that a common group makes
common group, because fewer computations are required to actually send
a message, the group can be substantially larger while still retaining
good performance.
Ooops. This should read:
I don't agree with your characterization that a DH static key is
'insecure due to reuse'. While it's true that a common group makes an
attractive target, because fewer computations are required to actually
send a message, the group can be substantially larger while still
retaining good performance.
-Ekr
--
[Eric Rescorla ekr(_at_)rtfm(_dot_)com]