Re: Comments on drafts.

Andrew:

> cms-09.txt:
>
> 1: Reference to MUSTSHOULD?
Why?  The document does not capitalize those words.

> 1: The first sentence is the same as the first sentence from the Abstract, 
> but missing authentication or digesting.
>
> 5.1: Last two paragraphs belong in 5.2
>
> 11: The attributes defined can also presumably be used in enveloped-data. I 
> can't actually see how or why, but there's a pointer from 6.1 to here.
None of these are a big deal.  I will add them if a version 11 is needed.

Russ