Russ,
Also, I am not suggesting it MUST be changed, just that it would be preferred to
be consistent, if at all possible,
Don Johnson
Russ Housley <housley(_at_)spyrus(_dot_)com> on 11/22/99 01:50:56 PM
To: Don Johnson/Certicom(_at_)Certicom
cc: "John C. Kennedy" <jkennedy(_at_)trustpoint(_dot_)com>,
pgut001(_at_)cs(_dot_)aucKland(_dot_)ac(_dot_)nz,
ietf-pkix(_at_)imc(_dot_)org, ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org,
ipsec(_at_)lists(_dot_)tislabs(_dot_)com,
ekr(_at_)rtfm(_dot_)com, robert(_dot_)zuccherato(_at_)entrust(_dot_)com,
wpolk(_at_)nist(_dot_)gov, jis(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu,
mleech(_at_)nortelnetworks(_dot_)com, Elaine Barker
<elaine(_dot_)barker(_at_)nist(_dot_)gov>, Sharon
Keller <skeller(_at_)nist(_dot_)gov>, Simon
Blake-Wilson/Certicom(_at_)Certicom, "Phil
Griffin" <Phil_Griffin(_at_)certicom(_dot_)com>
Subject: RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other
Don:
At 09:36 AM 11/22/99 -0500, Don Johnson wrote:
2. The order of the parameters in the domain parameters should be made
consistent with X9.30 DSA, I think. If this is not the way it is, it
should be
changed in X9.42.
I find no ASN.1 in X9.30 part 1.
Russ