This has not been taken care of in the -04 draft.
jim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-smime(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-smime(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of Blake
Ramsdell
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 4:04 PM
To: 'jimsch(_at_)nwlink(_dot_)com'; ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-smime-idea-03
Agree. I think this should be 300D at the beginning, and trim the last two
bytes off of both examples.
Blake
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Schaad [mailto:jimsch(_at_)nwlink(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 12:35 AM
To: ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: draft-ietf-smime-idea-03
The S/MIME Capability sequences appear to be wrong. In section 4 paragraph
2,
the text states that the parameters field must be absent, however the
encoding
sequence given has the parameters encoded as NULL. The same is true in
paragraph
3 of the same section.
jim
http://www.nwlink.com