A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 3126
Title: Electronic Signature Formats for long term
electronic signatures
Author(s): D. Pinkas, J. Ross, N. Pope
Status: Informational
Date: September 2001
Mailbox: harri(_dot_)rasilainen(_at_)etsi(_dot_)fr, Denis.Pinkas
@bull.net,
ross(_at_)secstan(_dot_)com, pope(_at_)secstan(_dot_)com
Pages: 84
Characters: 175886
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-smime-esformats-03.txt
URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3126.txt
This document defines the format of an electronic signature that can
remain valid over long periods. This includes evidence as to its
validity even if the signer or verifying party later attempts to deny
(i.e., repudiates the validity of the signature).
The format can be considered as an extension to RFC 2630 and RFC 2634,
where, when appropriate additional signed and unsigned attributes have
been defined.
The contents of this Informational RFC is technically equivalent to
ETSI TS 101 733 V.1.2.2. The ETSI TS is under the ETSI Copyright (C).
Individual copies of this ETSI deliverable can be downloaded from
http://www.etsi.org
This document is a product of the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group
of the IETF.
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST(_at_)IETF(_dot_)ORG(_dot_) Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG(_dot_)
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
To: rfc-info(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG
Subject: getting rfcs
help: ways_to_get_rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to
RFC-Manager(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG(_dot_) Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.echo
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG(_dot_) Please consult RFC 2223,
Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.
Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
USC/Information Sciences Institute
...
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
of the RFCs.
- <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3126.txt>
-