[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mistake in RFC 3126

2003-02-14 11:51:07

This definitely looks like an error to me.


At 10:27 AM 2/13/2003 +0100, Petra Barzin wrote:

I think there is a mistake in RFC 3126 - Electronic Signature
Formats for long term electronic signatures. The definition of the
RevocationValues attribute is as follows:

  RevocationValues ::=  SEQUENCE {
      crlVals           [0] SEQUENCE OF CertificateList     OPTIONAL,
      ocspVals          [1] SEQUENCE OF BasicOCSPResponse   OPTIONAL,
      otherRevVals      [2] OtherRevVals

Shouldn't the other revocation values be optional as well?
Did I miss something or am I right?

Best regards - Petra Barzin

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>