With Paul and Anders help, I have addressed some outstanding IESG (or
AD) comments that I did not hear of until after the Vienna meeting. The
comments and their resolution are included below. I also updated WRAP
so that it includes a specification of AES key sizes in alignment with
the -05 issue of MSGbis. This latter issue was mentioned in my status
report in Vienna.
So you should look for an -08 issue of WRAP and an -09 issue of
TRANSPORT in the Internet-Drafts directory in short order (posted Friday
AM).
Cheers!
Chris
______WRAP COMMENTS________
3.2----->"whatever gateway system that is bridging" seems grammatically
wrong.
Replaced with "any gateway system that might bridge the gap".
3.2.1---->"since it is out" should be "since it is outside"?
Done.
3.3----->"If other binary transport" should "If another binary"?
Replaced with "If other transport (e.g., X.400) that is optimized for
binary content". I think that's clearer.
3.3.1------> "it is out" again, outside?
Done.
3.4.1---> "7-bit transport, is optional" spurious comma.
Done.
3.4.1--->"certs-only, which is only for signed)" seems to be missing a
noun.
Replaced with "certs-only, which applies only to signed-only messages)".
______TRANSPORT COMMENTS________
2.6.1--->"because those type do not" has subject/verb agreeement
problem.
Changed "type" to "types".
2.6.2-----> "A RecipeintInfo" should be "RecipientInfo".
Done.